Portion of people living in counties with a population-to-primary care physician ratio of less than 2,000:1

Indicator Summary Score
0
100
NOT AVAILABLE

Numbers listed on the maps are indicator summary scores, which measure how far a state has to go to meet the HOPE Goal (Distance to Goal) and how much variation there is across racial and ethnic groups within the state on the measure (Racial Inequity). Scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 indicating the state with the best combined performance. Hovering over a state reveals information on Distance to Goal and Racial Inequity separately.

Arizona
Indicator Summary Score:
72
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Alaska
Indicator Summary Score:
88
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Alabama
Indicator Summary Score:
50
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Colorado
Indicator Summary Score:
82
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Connecticut
Indicator Summary Score:
96
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Delaware
Indicator Summary Score:
68
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Florida
Indicator Summary Score:
82
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Georgia
Indicator Summary Score:
51
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Hawaii
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Iowa
Indicator Summary Score:
51
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Idaho
Indicator Summary Score:
27
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Illinois
Indicator Summary Score:
52
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Indiana
Indicator Summary Score:
36
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Kansas
Indicator Summary Score:
73
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Kentucky
Indicator Summary Score:
27
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Louisiana
Indicator Summary Score:
34
Inequity
Distance to Goal
California
Indicator Summary Score:
85
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Maine
Indicator Summary Score:
88
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Michigan
Indicator Summary Score:
55
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Minnesota
Indicator Summary Score:
70
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Missouri
Indicator Summary Score:
27
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Mississippi
Indicator Summary Score:
23
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Montana
Indicator Summary Score:
87
Inequity
Distance to Goal
North Carolina
Indicator Summary Score:
10
Inequity
Distance to Goal
North Dakota
Indicator Summary Score:
0
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Nebraska
Indicator Summary Score:
74
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New Hampshire
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New Jersey
Indicator Summary Score:
83
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New Mexico
Indicator Summary Score:
62
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Nevada
Indicator Summary Score:
79
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New York
Indicator Summary Score:
84
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Ohio
Indicator Summary Score:
41
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Maryland
Indicator Summary Score:
79
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Oklahoma
Indicator Summary Score:
4
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Oregon
Indicator Summary Score:
93
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Pennsylvania
Indicator Summary Score:
79
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Rhode Island
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
South Carolina
Indicator Summary Score:
62
Inequity
Distance to Goal
South Dakota
Indicator Summary Score:
1
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Tennessee
Indicator Summary Score:
32
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Texas
Indicator Summary Score:
61
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Utah
Indicator Summary Score:
29
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Virginia
Indicator Summary Score:
56
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Vermont
Indicator Summary Score:
99
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Washington
Indicator Summary Score:
87
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Wisconsin
Indicator Summary Score:
63
Inequity
Distance to Goal
West Virginia
Indicator Summary Score:
48
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Massachusetts
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Wyoming
Indicator Summary Score:
73
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Arkansas
Indicator Summary Score:
48
Inequity
Distance to Goal
81%
National Rate
of people live in counties with access to primary care
100%
Hope Goal
People who live in counties with access to primary care
63 Million
Distance to Goal:
More people would need to live in counties with access to primary care to achieve the HOPE Goal
Why it Matters.

Having access to primary care allows better coordination of care for patients and easier access to essential and necessary health services.

Indicator Summary
  • Asian/Pacific Islander populations have the most adequate access to primary care physicians with 95% having access.
  • American Indian/Alaska Native populations have the least access to primary care physicians with 67% having access.
  • Six Northeastern states (Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont, Maine and Connecticut) perform the best on access to primary care ranking in the top ten states with adequate access.
  • Seven Southern states (Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Louisiana, West Virginia, Kentucky, and North Carolina) fare poorly on access to primary care ranking in the bottom ten states with adequate access.
State Distance to Goal.
Access to Primary Care

This chart is interactive. Explore data by hovering the dots to compare different race and ethnicity groups.

State Distance to Goal.
Access to Primary Care

This chart is interactive. Explore data by hovering the dots to compare different race and ethnicity groups.

Select States
Hope Goal
100%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AZ
Arizona
AK
Alaska
AL
Alabama
CO
Colorado
CT
Connecticut
DE
Delaware
FL
Florida
GA
Georgia
HI
Hawaii
IA
Iowa
ID
Idaho
IL
Illinois
IN
Indiana
KS
Kansas
KY
Kentucky
LA
Louisiana
CA
California
ME
Maine
MI
Michigan
MN
Minnesota
MO
Missouri
MS
Mississippi
MT
Montana
NC
North Carolina
ND
North Dakota
NE
Nebraska
NH
New Hampshire
NJ
New Jersey
NM
New Mexico
NV
Nevada
NY
New York
OH
Ohio
MD
Maryland
OK
Oklahoma
OR
Oregon
PA
Pennsylvania
RI
Rhode Island
SC
South Carolina
SD
South Dakota
TN
Tennessee
TX
Texas
UT
Utah
VA
Virginia
VT
Vermont
WA
Washington
WI
Wisconsin
WV
West Virginia
MA
Massachusetts
WY
Wyoming
AR
Arkansas
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.