Households with no severe housing problems are defined as having good housing quality. Specifically, they have complete kitchens, functioning plumbing, and are not overcrowded or severely cost-burdened (monthly housing costs exceeding 50% of monthly income)

Indicator Summary Score
0
100
NOT AVAILABLE

Numbers listed on the maps are indicator summary scores, which measure how far a state has to go to meet the HOPE Goal (Distance to Goal) and how much variation there is across racial and ethnic groups within the state on the measure (Racial Inequity). Scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 indicating the state with the best combined performance. Hovering over a state reveals information on Distance to Goal and Racial Inequity separately.

Alaska
Indicator Summary Score:
64
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Alabama
Indicator Summary Score:
86
Inequity
Distance to Goal
California
Indicator Summary Score:
55
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Colorado
Indicator Summary Score:
87
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Connecticut
Indicator Summary Score:
67
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Delaware
Indicator Summary Score:
90
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Florida
Indicator Summary Score:
72
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Georgia
Indicator Summary Score:
86
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Hawaii
Indicator Summary Score:
40
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Iowa
Indicator Summary Score:
71
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Idaho
Indicator Summary Score:
99
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Illinois
Indicator Summary Score:
82
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Indiana
Indicator Summary Score:
93
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Kansas
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Kentucky
Indicator Summary Score:
91
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Louisiana
Indicator Summary Score:
77
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Massachusetts
Indicator Summary Score:
67
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Maryland
Indicator Summary Score:
90
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Maine
Indicator Summary Score:
88
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Michigan
Indicator Summary Score:
91
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Minnesota
Indicator Summary Score:
89
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Missouri
Indicator Summary Score:
93
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Mississippi
Indicator Summary Score:
78
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Montana
Indicator Summary Score:
60
Inequity
Distance to Goal
North Carolina
Indicator Summary Score:
88
Inequity
Distance to Goal
North Dakota
Indicator Summary Score:
88
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Nebraska
Indicator Summary Score:
98
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New Hampshire
Indicator Summary Score:
94
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New Jersey
Indicator Summary Score:
67
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New Mexico
Indicator Summary Score:
75
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Nevada
Indicator Summary Score:
74
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New York
Indicator Summary Score:
52
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Ohio
Indicator Summary Score:
91
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Pennsylvania
Indicator Summary Score:
76
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Rhode Island
Indicator Summary Score:
85
Inequity
Distance to Goal
South Carolina
Indicator Summary Score:
87
Inequity
Distance to Goal
South Dakota
Indicator Summary Score:
83
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Tennessee
Indicator Summary Score:
89
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Texas
Indicator Summary Score:
88
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Utah
Indicator Summary Score:
88
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Virginia
Indicator Summary Score:
95
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Oregon
Indicator Summary Score:
72
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Vermont
Indicator Summary Score:
64
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Washington
Indicator Summary Score:
88
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Wisconsin
Indicator Summary Score:
90
Inequity
Distance to Goal
West Virginia
Indicator Summary Score:
67
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Oklahoma
Indicator Summary Score:
92
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Arizona
Indicator Summary Score:
78
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Wyoming
Indicator Summary Score:
92
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Arkansas
Indicator Summary Score:
92
Inequity
Distance to Goal
83%
National Rate
of households have good housing quality
92%
Hope Goal
Households with good housing quality
10 Million
Distance to Goal:
More households would need to have good housing quality to achieve the HOPE Goal
Why it Matters.

Having good housing quality prevents poor health outcomes caused by substandard housing, like those associated with poor ventilation, and it prevents cost-burdened households from delaying medical care.

Indicator Summary
  • White households have the highest rates of housing quality with 86% of White households living in housing with adequate amenities that are not cost burdensome.
  • Black households have the worst housing quality with 74% of Black households living in housing with no severe problems in their houses.
  • Nine Midwestern states (Iowa, North Dakota, Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, Wisconsin, South Dakota, Indiana, and Missouri) fare better on this indicator ranking among the top ten states in housing quality.
  • Five Western states (Hawaii, California, Alaska, Nevada, and New Mexico) and three Southern states (District of Columbia, Florida, Louisiana) fare poorly on this indicator ranking among the bottom ten states in housing quality.
* Rates for Black respondents in Montana and Vermont; and American Indians/Alaska Native respondents in the District of Columbia, Hawaii, New Hampshire and Vermont suppressed due to <50 respondents.
State Distance to Goal.
Housing Quality

This chart is interactive. Explore data by hovering the dots to compare different race and ethnicity groups.

State Distance to Goal.
Housing Quality

This chart is interactive. Explore data by hovering the dots to compare different race and ethnicity groups.

Select States
Hope Goal
92%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
AK
Alaska
AL
Alabama
CA
California
CO
Colorado
CT
Connecticut
DE
Delaware
FL
Florida
GA
Georgia
HI
Hawaii
IA
Iowa
ID
Idaho
IL
Illinois
IN
Indiana
KS
Kansas
KY
Kentucky
LA
Louisiana
MA
Massachusetts
MD
Maryland
ME
Maine
MI
Michigan
MN
Minnesota
MO
Missouri
MS
Mississippi
MT
Montana
NC
North Carolina
ND
North Dakota
NE
Nebraska
NH
New Hampshire
NJ
New Jersey
NM
New Mexico
NV
Nevada
NY
New York
OH
Ohio
PA
Pennsylvania
RI
Rhode Island
SC
South Carolina
SD
South Dakota
TN
Tennessee
TX
Texas
UT
Utah
VA
Virginia
OR
Oregon
VT
Vermont
WA
Washington
WI
Wisconsin
WV
West Virginia
OK
Oklahoma
AZ
Arizona
WY
Wyoming
AR
Arkansas
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.