Counties with low liquor store density are defined as those with fewer than 1.77 liquor stores per 10,000 population

Indicator Summary Score
0
100
NOT AVAILABLE

Numbers listed on the maps are indicator summary scores, which measure how far a state has to go to meet the HOPE Goal (Distance to Goal) and how much variation there is across racial and ethnic groups within the state on the measure (Racial Inequity). Scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 indicating the state with the best combined performance. Hovering over a state reveals information on Distance to Goal and Racial Inequity separately.

Arkansas
Indicator Summary Score:
0
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Arizona
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
California
Indicator Summary Score:
98
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Colorado
Indicator Summary Score:
37
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Connecticut
Indicator Summary Score:
35
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Delaware
Indicator Summary Score:
35
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Florida
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Georgia
Indicator Summary Score:
84
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Hawaii
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Iowa
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Idaho
Indicator Summary Score:
99
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Illinois
Indicator Summary Score:
98
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Indiana
Indicator Summary Score:
98
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Kansas
Indicator Summary Score:
17
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Kentucky
Indicator Summary Score:
12
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Louisiana
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Massachusetts
Indicator Summary Score:
18
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Maryland
Indicator Summary Score:
36
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Maine
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Michigan
Indicator Summary Score:
8
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Alabama
Indicator Summary Score:
99
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Minnesota
Indicator Summary Score:
75
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Missouri
Indicator Summary Score:
99
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Mississippi
Indicator Summary Score:
78
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Montana
Indicator Summary Score:
94
Inequity
Distance to Goal
North Carolina
Indicator Summary Score:
99
Inequity
Distance to Goal
North Dakota
Indicator Summary Score:
97
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Nebraska
Indicator Summary Score:
95
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New Hampshire
Indicator Summary Score:
98
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New Jersey
Indicator Summary Score:
31
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New Mexico
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Nevada
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
New York
Indicator Summary Score:
56
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Ohio
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Oklahoma
Indicator Summary Score:
96
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Oregon
Indicator Summary Score:
99
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Pennsylvania
Indicator Summary Score:
76
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Rhode Island
Indicator Summary Score:
36
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Alaska
Indicator Summary Score:
99
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Utah
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Virginia
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Vermont
Indicator Summary Score:
16
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Washington
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Texas
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Wisconsin
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Tennessee
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
West Virginia
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
South Dakota
Indicator Summary Score:
97
Inequity
Distance to Goal
South Carolina
Indicator Summary Score:
100
Inequity
Distance to Goal
Wyoming
Indicator Summary Score:
39
Inequity
Distance to Goal
85%
National Rate
of people are living in counties with low liquor store density
100%
Hope Goal
People living in counties with low liquor store density
42 Million
Distance to Goal:
More people would need to live in counties with low liquor store density to achieve the HOPE Goal
Why it Matters.

Having low liquor store density is likely to decrease rates of alcohol consumption, violent crimes, and intimate partner violence in the surrounding population.

Indicator Summary
  • American Indian/Alaska Native populations are the most likely to live in low liquor store density areas (i.e., with fewer than 1.77 liquor stores per 10,000 people) with 93% doing so.
  • Hispanic populations are the least likely to live in areas with low liquor store density with 78% of Hispanics doing so.
  • Four Western states (Washington, Utah, New Mexico, and Nevada) and three Southern states (West Virginia, South Carolina, Louisiana) fare better on this indicator ranking among the top ten states with residents living in low liquor store density areas.
  • Five Northeastern states (Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Vermont) and three Southern states (Delaware, District of Columbia, and Maryland) fare poorly on this indicator ranking among the bottom ten states with residents living in low liquor store density areas.
State Distance to Goal.
Low Liquor Store Density

This chart is interactive. Explore data by hovering the dots to compare different race and ethnicity groups.

State Distance to Goal.
Low Liquor Store Density

This chart is interactive. Explore data by hovering the dots to compare different race and ethnicity groups.

Select States
Hope Goal
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
AR
Arkansas
AZ
Arizona
CA
California
CO
Colorado
CT
Connecticut
DE
Delaware
FL
Florida
GA
Georgia
HI
Hawaii
IA
Iowa
ID
Idaho
IL
Illinois
IN
Indiana
KS
Kansas
KY
Kentucky
LA
Louisiana
MA
Massachusetts
MD
Maryland
ME
Maine
MI
Michigan
AL
Alabama
MN
Minnesota
MO
Missouri
MS
Mississippi
MT
Montana
NC
North Carolina
ND
North Dakota
NE
Nebraska
NH
New Hampshire
NJ
New Jersey
NM
New Mexico
NV
Nevada
NY
New York
OH
Ohio
OK
Oklahoma
OR
Oregon
PA
Pennsylvania
RI
Rhode Island
AK
Alaska
UT
Utah
VA
Virginia
VT
Vermont
WA
Washington
TX
Texas
WI
Wisconsin
TN
Tennessee
WV
West Virginia
SD
South Dakota
SC
South Carolina
WY
Wyoming
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.